Questions & Alpha with Max Tavner and Eddie Noyons

Questions & Alpha: Max Tavner and Eddie Noyons on Launching Crypto Projects in Today's Market

Authored by James Newell, Foundation & Corporate Communications Director, GSR.

The rules for launching a crypto project have changed. A year ago, a strong narrative and a token launch date were often enough to draw investor attention. Today, that is no longer the case. In this edition of Questions & Alpha, James Newell sits down with Max Tavner and Eddie Noyons of Autonomous to talk through what it actually takes to launch and sustain a crypto project in the current market, from picking a jurisdiction to splitting ownership between equity and tokens to supporting founders long after launch day.

In this conversation:

• The competition for liquidity has intensified. Projects now need real fundamentals and revenue, not just momentum, to secure investment.
• Rug pulls involving labs and development teams have complicated token narratives and left founders unsure how to structure their companies.
• Crypto projects share the basics with traditional startups, but face added complexity around technical execution, product-market fit, and funding structure.
• The absence of the Clarity Act forces founders into geographic arbitrage, choosing jurisdictions to satisfy investors, communities, and regulators at once.
• Equity is regaining favor over token warrants, though tokens still play a role when tied to real utility rather than governance alone.
• The market improves with more liquidity and regulatory clarity, and catalysts like a Bitcoin rally or wallet adoption by major platforms could help get it there.

James Newell: How would you describe the state of project launches in crypto today?

Max Tavner: It's a competitive battle for liquidity right now. Sentiment has shifted a lot compared to where it was twelve months ago, and that shows up in how founders have to approach a raise. It's no longer enough to have a good idea and a launch date on the calendar. Investors are more selective, and they're putting their capital behind teams that can back up their story with numbers.

Eddie Noyons: That's right. Projects can no longer count on momentum or the assumption that a token launch will happen automatically just because a project has reached a certain stage. Investors want to see stronger fundamentals and real revenue generation before they commit capital. That's a meaningful change in mindset from where the market was a year ago, when a compelling narrative could carry a project a long way on its own.

James Newell: How is launching and operating a crypto project different from running a traditional startup?

Max Tavner: There's a lot of overlap on the basics. You still need financial reporting, compliance, and governance, just like any startup, and those disciplines don't go away just because you're working with tokens instead of, or alongside, equity. What's different is the layer on top of that. Crypto projects deal with a much higher degree of technical complexity than most traditional startups, it's harder to prove product-market fit in a space that's still relatively young, and founders have to figure out early on whether they're raising through equity, tokens, or some combination of both. That funding decision alone adds a layer of complexity that most traditional founders never have to think about.

Eddie Noyons: And there's still no legal clarity to lean on. The Clarity Act hasn't passed, which adds a lot of complexity to how projects are structured and where they choose to operate. Founders end up managing a kind of geographic arbitrage just to stay compliant across different regulatory regimes around the world, and that's a constant, ongoing exercise rather than something they solve once and move past.

James Newell: What's the most common mistake projects make when they launch, and what's the missing ingredient for a successful launch in this market?

Eddie Noyons: Token narratives have taken a hit from rug pulls, cases where labs or development teams were sold out from under a project. That's left a lot of uncertainty about how crypto-adjacent companies should be structured, and founders who get that structure wrong early on tend to pay for it later, sometimes long after the launch itself. It's created a more cautious environment where the structure behind a project gets just as much scrutiny as the product.

Max Tavner: The missing ingredient is usually fundamentals. Projects that can show real revenue and a clear reason for the token to exist are the ones getting funded right now. The ones still leaning on narrative alone are having a much harder time, because investors have seen enough cycles now to know that a good story isn't the same thing as a durable business.

James Newell: How do you help projects think through splitting ownership between equity and tokens?

Max Tavner: We work through it with them case by case, since there's no single formula that fits every project. Investors used to prioritize token warrants, but that's shifted. There's more interest now in holding equity in the labs company itself, largely because it offers more stability than a token position, particularly in a market where token narratives have come under pressure.

Eddie Noyons: Tokens haven't gone away as a fundraising tool, but the successful projects are treating them as a utility feature within the protocol rather than leaning on them purely for governance. That distinction matters a lot to investors now. A token that does something within the ecosystem is a very different proposition from a token that exists mainly to signal voting rights.

James Newell: How do projects decide which jurisdiction to set up in, and what's driving that decision right now?

Eddie Noyons: It really depends on the investor base and the community you're building for. Different jurisdictions appeal to different types of backers, so there isn't a one-size-fits-all answer. The Cayman Islands are still popular, partly because of their long track record in international finance and asset management, which gives founders and investors alike a level of comfort that newer jurisdictions haven't yet built up.

Max Tavner: Beyond that, founders need to look at the quality of local legal and professional services, since that has a real, practical impact on how smoothly a project can operate day to day. Jurisdictions like Cayman, BVI, and Switzerland have seasoned decades-long histories as traditional financial hubs with established corporate service support, which can all help support crypto project structures. Teams also need to understand jurisdiction-specific rules, like VASP acts, that will govern how the project can actually function once it's up and running. Getting that wrong can create problems well after the initial setup is done.

James Newell: How do you think about supporting a project across its full lifecycle, not just at launch?

Max Tavner: Our team stays involved well past launch. That means helping with financial reporting, grant management, and adjusting as the market shifts underneath a project, because the environment a project launches into rarely stays the same for very long. Having a partner with a solid reputation matters a lot for continuity, especially once a project starts to pivot or expand its mandate after launch. Founders need someone who understands where they started and can help them adapt without losing that continuity.

James Newell: What needs to happen for the launch environment to improve from here?

Eddie Noyons: Two things, mainly: more liquidity and more regulatory clarity. Those two factors tend to reinforce each other, since clearer rules tend to bring more capital into the space, and more capital tends to support the kind of activity that gives regulators confidence.

Max Tavner: On the liquidity side, a significant move up in Bitcoin could help, and so could major platforms adopting on-chain wallets. Both would bring in non-crypto native users and create new use cases that actually matter to people, rather than use cases that only make sense to those who are already deep in the space.

This material is provided by GSR (the “Firm”) solely for informational purposes. It is not intended to be advice or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any investment mentioned. Investors should form their own views in relation to any proposed investment.

It is intended only for sophisticated, institutional investors and does not constitute an offer or commitment, a solicitation of an offer or commitment, or any advice or recommendation, to enter into or conclude any transaction (whether on the terms shown or otherwise), or to provide investment services in any state or country where such an offer or solicitation or provision would be illegal. The Firm is not and does not act as an advisor or fiduciary in providing this material.

This material is not an independent research report, and has not been prepared in accordance with any legal requirements by any regulator (including the FCA, FINRA or CFTC) designed to promote the independence of investment research.

This material is not independent of the Firm’s proprietary interests, which may conflict with the interests of any counterparty of the Firm. The Firm may trade investments discussed in this material for its own account, may trade contrary to the views expressed in this material, and may have positions in other related instruments. The Firm is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of this material.

Information contained herein is based on sources considered to be reliable, but is not guaranteed to be accurate or complete. Any opinions or estimates expressed herein reflect a judgment made by the author(s) as of the date of publication, and are subject to change without notice. The Firm does not plan to update this information.

Trading and investing in digital assets involves significant risks including price volatility and illiquidity and may not be suitable for all investors. The Firm is not liable whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from the use of this material. Copyright of this material belongs to GSR. Neither this material nor any copy thereof may be taken, reproduced or redistributed, directly or indirectly, without prior written permission of GSR.

Please see here for additional Regulatory Legal Notices relevant to US, UK and Singapore.